food and politics

VERY INFORMATIVE BUT THE INFORMATION REGARDING PORK,SEEMS INCOMPLETE, I HAVE READ ,SO MANY ARTICLES SHOWING THE HARMFUL EFFECTS TO HUMAN , BY CONSUMING PORK                      IT IS TOLD THAT PORK IS TASTIEST MEET 

PURE VEGETARIANISM IS A MYTH

HOW MANY  MICROBES ARE IN CURD,MILK, IN OUR MOUTH AND BELLY HOW MANY LIVING THINGS IN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES  THE UNSEEN ANTS  AND FLIES IN BOILED WATER AND MILK ARE CONSUMED BY ALL WITHOUT ANY DOUBT

EVEN THE PLANTS,GRAINS, PULSES,EGGS ALL HAVE LIFE IN HIDDEN FORM

SO THERE IS NO BASIS FOR MORALITY AND RATIONALITY IN DECIDING THE FOOD HABITS

HOW FAR THE RESULTS   OF RESEARCH ARE RELIABLE   EVEN IN SCIENCE AND HISTORY DECISIONS ARE BASED ON THE AVAILABLE KNOWLEDGE TO THE CONCERNED    THE SUGGESTIONS IN AYURVEDA, NATUROPATHY,  ALL DEPENDENT  ON INSUFFICIENT DATA AND ANALYSIS THIS IS THE SITUATION IN MODERN MEDICINE EXCEPT THAT THERE SO MANY OTHER FACTS LIKE MONOPOLY,MASS ADVERTISEMENT WHICH MAKE IT MORE DOMINANT AND SO MORE ACCEPTABLE

SO FOOD HABIT IS FORMED BY SO MANY VARIANTS LIKE CULTURE, TRADITION AVAILABILITY NECESSITY PERSONAL AND SOCIAL MANIAS AND MAFIAS

COCONUT OIL IS HIGHLIGHTED BY COCONUT BOARD WHERE AS SOYBEAN LOBBY IS AGAINST COCONUT OIL 

MOST INDIANS CONSUME FISH AND MEET IN ANCIENT AND PRESENT TIME   SO BAN ON COW SLAUGHTER IS ONLY A POLITICAL GIMMICK 

THERE IN NO PLACE IN IT FOR MORALITY OR RELIGION IF SO WHY DO NOT BAN FISH ,PORK,ETC WHICH ARE INCARNATIONS AS PER EPICS

THERE IS NO RATIONAL IN THE DECISIONS TO BAN SLAUGHTER OF WILD ANIMALS ,SNAKES, AND DOGS, WHICH ARE HARMFUL TO DOMESTIC,CIVIL HABITATION     FROM THAT COWS ARE LESS HARMFUL AND SEEMS THE BAN IS BETTER THAN THAT OF KILLING OF DOGS

FROM ECONOMIC POINT OF VIEW  ,THE BAN OF COW SLAUGHTER IS NOT A RATIONAL DECISION IT MAY CREATE PROBLEMS OF STRAY CATTLE AND FEED AND FODDER  IT MAY AFFECT THE LIFE OF BUTCHERS AND TRADERS AND FARMERS AND LEATHER INDUSTRY

THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT CONCERNED BY HEALTH SIDE OF CITIZENS ,OTHERWISE THE FIRST PRIORITY WILL BE TO IMPLEMENT THE BAN ON ALCHAHOL

IT IS HOPED THAT THE GOVERNMENT MAY STUDY THE PROS AND CONS OF THESE TYPE OF LAWS BY IMPARTIAL EXPERTS ,BEFORE MAKING ANY CHANGE IN EXISTING CONDITIONS